While the world economy languishes, paintings and sculpture continue to command dizzying prices. Georgina Adam explains how competitive billionaires, new wealth and the fashions of the super-rich keep values sky high.
Imagine Las Vegas casino owner Steve Wynn’s horror when, seven years
ago, he accidentally put his elbow through Picasso’s painting Le Rêve
(The Dream), just as he was about to sell it for an eye-popping $139m.
The
painting is one of a series of sensuous portraits of the artist’s young
mistress Marie-Thérèse Walter, painted in 1932 during their torrid
affair. Such works are among the most desirable by Picasso and the price
would have set a new high for the artist – but with the painting
punctured, the buyer, billionaire hedge fund mogul Steve Cohen, called
off the deal.
Now, after a skillful repair, the sale has finally
gone through, but this time for $150m, setting a new record for Picasso
as well as being the highest price any American collector has ever paid
for a work of art. This was a private sale, and at auction records are
also being shattered: last year in New York, Edvard Munch’s The Scream
made almost $120m.
While much of the world is mired in economic
gloom, the art market – which regularly sees multi-million prices set
for paintings and sculpture – seems to be living in a parallel universe.
Le Rêve just one example of how values are spiralling upwards, driven
by new money, newly emerged economies, speculation and a fashion for art
that overlaps with lifestyle choices and the luxury goods industry.
The
seemingly gravity-defying art market also reflects the nature of wealth
today. The sheer amount of money in private hands allows billionaires –
and there are, at the last count according to Forbes, 1,426 of them
spread throughout the world – to indulge in a highly competitive sport
to bag the best artworks. And after all, if you can spend nearly $1bn on
a yacht, as the Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich is supposed to
have spent on his floating palace Eclipse, another few millions for a
trophy picture is not that much.
And while you can build another
yacht, you can’t get a top Manet, Cézanne or Raphael made for you – you
have to vie with other collectors when one appears on the market.
A changing picture
This
is a market which has, over the last 25 years, seen a massive growth in
size. According to art economist Dr Clare McAndrew, in a report
published in 2012, about $27.2bn worth of art was sold through dealers
and auction houses in 1990. By 2007, at the peak of the last boom, this
figure had almost tripled, to $65.8bn. In 2012, according to her latest
findings, it was still worth a stunning $56bn, despite shrinking
slightly compared to the previous year.
As well as expanding, the
business of selling art has been profoundly modified by the arrival of
new economies. This is now a global market, no longer dominated by the
US and Europe and by American and European artists. Just two years ago,
in the grip of sometimes extravagant spending on art in mainland China –
and probably aided by some optimistic reporting – China leapfrogged
into the top position, with the highest total in this field. While it
has now fallen back to the number two slot, China and Hong Kong still
represent 25% of art sales, with only the US ahead, with 33%.
Works
of art have been sold in China at levels that used to be reserved for
the top Western names. For instance an 11th century calligraphy scroll
by Huang Tingjian sold recently for a stunning $63.8m in Beijing.
The
fashion for private and indeed state-sponsored museums has also been
driving the top end of the market - Gulf states, particularly Qatar and
the United Arab Emirates, have been eagerly acquiring works of art for
ambitious museum programmes. The Qatari royal family, notably Sheikha
Mayassa Al Thani, daughter of the Emir, has been extremely active, and
is thought to be the biggest buyer in the world today. What does she
buy? Mainly modern and contemporary art, and Qatar is generally thought
to have paid the highest price ever for an artwork – $250m in 2011 for
Cézanne’s The Card Players.
Disparity in fortunes
Buying
art, for many of today’s newly wealthy, also gives access to a
glamorous lifestyle. There is an endless round of art fairs, biennales,
auctions and events all over the world to attend, where galleries and
auction houses put on the most glittering parties. Fashion magazines,
luxury goods and watch companies pile in, as well as banks, who are
increasingly watching art as a new asset class. In some countries such
as China or India, art buying is considered first and foremost for
investment, rather than for passion or as a hobby.
The flip side
of all this is polarisation, with a small crust of very rich people
driving the market, pushing up prices for a handful of ’blue-chip’
artists and enriching a few big galleries and a few auction houses.
Further down the scale, however, the middle and lower ends of the market
are far less buoyant. So while the overall picture seems rosy, in fact
it disguises increasing disparity in fortunes.
Particularly in the
mid-market, some galleries are closing, and many are having a hard
time. The London gallery Hotel, despite its high reputation as a
cutting-edge space, went into liquidation last year. More recently,
gallerists Nicole Klagsbrun in New York and Jérôme de Noirmont have
started to work differently and have abandoned their showrooms.
Art,
sadly, seems to have become much more of a rich man’s game. And while
the appetite for big names such as Picasso and works like Le Rêve seems
unquenchable for the moment, things are not necessarily so dreamy for
younger and lesser-known artists.
For source go here.
No comments:
Post a Comment